Spank! Teen and Youth Culture Online : a website with news and forums for teens and youthTeens read this website, youth read this website.

Often rated a Cool Site for Teens and Youth. love life, be a teen lot of people use the site
  New to Spank! Want a little info about this site? :: log in we run a www directory to add your URL too
RECENT THREADS:: What are you EXCITED about? (181/L) :: Best accidental artist (20) :: what book are you currently reading (865/L) :::: (expand list) (random 5) (tagwall)
lot of people use the site
Forum Index > Random Taggings > Politics and Issues
Click to post a reply!
Bushwhacked (42 posts)
Showing posts 1 to 20 : Next 20--> :
OR jump to page:  1  2  3 

Atheist
Inactive A lot of liberals feel like America has really gone down the toilet since Geroge W. Bush became President back in 2001. I am inclined majorly to agree, it least in a few main areas.

-The economy is not doing as well as it was back in the 1990s, although this might not be entirely his fault.

-We have gone from surpluses to deficits in four years, unemployment ratings are slightly higher (the jobs 'created' under Bush's reign fail to account for population gains, and in many cases pay less than those the recession had lost)

-Our military is in an undeniably difficult situation in Iraq. If you dispute this, then please answer why Bush has been unable/unwilling to give an exit strategy/timetable for our departure from Iraq.

- Healthcare is in shambles and with the baby boomer generation getting ready to retire in short order, things will get far worse before they get better. Social Security, unfortunately, looks much the same.

I could go on, but I see no point. Unsurprisingly, since being re-elected, Bush has found himself in a sort of haze. His agenda has been stalled in the halls of power and he is facing growing opposition in his own party on issues from Iraq to Social Security reform. His judicial appointments aren't getting confirmed very quickly, if at all. The gay marriage amendment is absolutely dead in the water. The Social Security bill was dead on arrival and will likely remain so for now. Iraq, despise the elections, has contined to drain financial and militarial resources from America in the form of money, blood and time. The economy has started slowing down and gas prices have been steadily rising, all on a backdrop of political malaise. Simply put, it is not a very good time to be George W. Bush.

So why isn't his approval in the toilet? Well, it is, at least compared to his first term averages. I would argue that Bush's approval has been this high for one reason only: war. I count 9/11 into war, as well, obviously. He's the self-proclaimed war-time President. But the war is starting to turn sour in the minds of Americans, as 56% in recent Gallup polling has come out against the idea of whether we should have gone in or not. An AP poll shows 55% disapproval for Bush. 61% of the nation according to a CBS poll feels he is not in agreement with them on the issues that matter the most personally. His approval on Social Security is about 25% with a majority of Republicans also disapproving. His approval on Iraq specifically in the CBS poll is at 37%.

Poll numbers aside, I believe the American people are suffering a sort of buyer's remorse after opting for a second Bush term over Kerry. Watching Bush's presidency fall apart and drag his party down with him for four years, is something I will enjoy very much. At the rate he is going, I'm not completely sure he will serve out a full second term.

So who got the bigger end of the bushwhack, America or Bush? I guess time will tell, but I believe we are entering a period in global history that will see the global decline in American economic, cultural, moral, militarial and finally political influence. Many conservatives are likely to view this with a "so what" attitude, but the simple fact is that we do need the rest of the world. Imperialism has been the downfall of every other major power before America, and so too it shall be for us.

This is probably very incoherent and disorganized, but I am thoroughly tired as I type this. Please feel free to interject your own opinion, commentary and flames at me as you wishSmile

[This post edited by Atheist on 19 June 2005 ]

quote / posted 19 June 2005 5:00 AM
GhanaGurl_42
(512k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
.

[This post edited by Evanich on 20 November 2011 ]

quote / posted 19 June 2005 5:20 AM
supporter graphic  Dante
(386k) Adored
Shoegazer
Click for profile
Well....if we look at it purely through the bi-partisan eye, i believe the rebuttal can be formulated upon the basis of the Canadian counterpart
quote / posted 19 June 2005 6:22 AM
LiMeDcOcOnUt
(234k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Moderator
Click for profile
I'll speak personally as an American.

I didnt vote for him, but everyone else did, and I've become far more concened about the happenings in my own state since then. I have not heard about much of any action that the Federal Government has been trying to make in months. Seriously, months. It seems like they're all just laying low, so my attentions turn to my own State and City govenrments, where all the stuff that affects me is happening.

I feel that I can only sit and watch as far as the presidency goes. He has 3 and some odd years to so something, or rather, maybe he'll just be nothing, and we'll be stuck in Iraq for some rediculous war that we'll be at for the next decade. I feel that George Bush and his administration has brought on a new state of stagnation.

So, In response, I shall turn inwards and worry about myself.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 8:41 AM
eldomo20
(357k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
Bah, Who cares? This has all been said before. Many, Many times.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 8:44 AM
LiMeDcOcOnUt
(234k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Moderator
Click for profile
Well, its our govenment, we should care.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 10:04 AM
eldomo20
(357k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
Well, Caring is fine I guess. Impotent bitching is not. Which is what most people choose to do. *CoughWillCough* Besides, It really has all been said before. Most of it has already been said on spank.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 10:11 AM
Alexander
(32k) Cherished
Spank! NovaStar
Click for profile
quoting: Atheist
A lot of liberals feel like America has really gone down the toilet since Geroge W. Bush became President back in 2001. I am inclined majorly to agree, it least in a few main areas.



Lets take this one item at a time. I'm not going to debate poll numbers because polls can be inaccurate and can easily mirror the opinion of the pollster depending on how the question is worded. But I will agree that Bush's support among conservatives is dropping for several main reasons.

quote:
-The economy is not doing as well as it was back in the 1990s, although this might not be entirely his fault.



Economies tend to be cyclical, however it is not one persons fault. Before Bush took office the economy was already starting to head south. The technology bubble had burst, and the GDP was cut from 7% to 4%. Now the "recession" began in Bush's third month in office. Before he had passed any significant economic legislation or had fully assembled his staff. Then when you factor in the impact of 9-11 you can't blame the guy.
quote:
The attacks had significant economic repercussions for the United States and world markets. The New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange and NASDAQ did not open on September 11 and remained closed until September 17. New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) facilities and remote data processing sites were not damaged by the attack, but member firms, customers and markets were unable to communicate due to major damage to the telephone exchange facility near the World Trade Center. When the stock markets reopened on September 17, 2001, after the longest closure since the Great Depression in 1933, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (“DJIA”) stock market index fell 684 points, or 7.1%, to 8920, its biggest-ever one-day point decline. By the end of the week, the DJIA had fallen 1369.7 points (14.3%), its largest one-week point drop in history. U.S. stocks lost $1.2 trillion in value for the week. As of 2005 the streets surrounding the Stock Exchange on Wall Street are still barricaded to prevent a physical attack upon the building.

North American air space was closed for several days after the attacks and air travel decreased significantly upon its reopening. As of 2005, the U.S. airline industry has not fully recovered, and only a handful of American airline corporations are performing well.

All towers in the United States were evacuated during the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, including Los Angeles, where traffic was at its lowest volume ever for that city, and the major downtown business district was virtually deserted as most businesses were closed.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_Terrorist_Attack#Economic_aftermath

Thats just the immediate aftermath. We still haven't factored in the damage the airline industry took as well as tourism.

Lets look at what has happened since the "evil tax cuts for the wealthy". Unemployment has fallen from its high levels of six+ to 5.1, we had the fastest quarter of growth in 20 years, which in that quarter America had the fastest economy in what is called the "industrialized world" (which excludes China) and there is an all time record number of people owning homes.

http://www.wnjpin.net/OneStopCareerCenter/LaborMarketInformation/lmi16/release1.htm

http://money.cnn.com/2003/10/30/news/economy/gdp/?cnn=yes

It is safe to say that the tax cuts gradually helped to improve the economic situation.


quote:
-We have gone from surpluses to deficits in four years, unemployment ratings are slightly higher (the jobs 'created' under Bush's reign fail to account for population gains, and in many cases pay less than those the recession had lost)



We never had a surplus to begin with. And yes the unemployment is slightly higher than where it was but it is still lower than the average rate of the 70's, 80's and 90's. We are at 5.1% currently 4% is considered full employment as about 4% of the population is constantly shifting from jobs, getting fired, layed off etc...
http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm
And as for incomes there is this

Since the third quarter of 2001 (which is the quarter immediately following the signing of Bush's first tax cut) personal income has shown roughly 5% growth, and has increased every quarter since then.


quote:
-Our military is in an undeniably difficult situation in Iraq. If you dispute this, then please answer why Bush has been unable/unwilling to give an exit strategy/timetable for our departure from Iraq.



Iraq is a tough situation. The exit strategy for Bush is called victory. Which is a free and stable Iraqi government which is able to defend itself from insurgents. This is where I feel that Bush is loosing support from his base. In the last few months he has switched his focus from defense issues to domestic issues. When was the last time you've seen him on TV discussing the war on terror? Bush needs to hold more press conferences on national TV and discuss the objectives in Iraq and how they are being accomplished. Such as how the Iraqi government is coming on their constitution...

quote:
- Healthcare is in shambles and with the baby boomer generation getting ready to retire in short order, things will get far worse before they get better. Social Security, unfortunately, looks much the same.



Barking up the wrong tree here. Bush and the republicans have been trying to fix social security. The dems have blocked every attempt. We all know about Bush and personal accounts for social security. But I ask you, what is the democrats plan for social security? They have not outlined one. Don't blame Bush, blame Howard Dean and the DNC, Harry Reed and others.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 6:08 PM
supporter graphic  Dante
(386k) Adored
Shoegazer
Click for profile
I think the under lying issue in all of this is that both Will and Alexander are swept up by Jacksonian politics. Their numbers will always differ, their logical arguments always opposing. In the end, everything they say will be of mere rhetorical value. One must question the validity of treating politics like war. Separating yourself into two distinct groups (liberals and conservatives) is merely the actions of sheep flocking to some symbolic beacon. It is not the sign of an informed voter...regardless of how many news clippings, public polls and media jargon you scrap book.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 8:16 PM
Mangasama
(244k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
ALEXANDER IS MY FRIEND BECAUSE HE ONLY EMERGES TO ARGUE. XDDD
quote / posted 19 June 2005 8:35 PM
Delphian
Inactive I thought this was going to be about the movie.

Sad!

I've never liked Bush. Never will. Don't really need to say why, right now anyway.

But the movie was okay.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 8:39 PM
Blatant
(252k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
quote:
I think the under lying issue in all of this is that both Will and Alexander are swept up by Jacksonian politics. Their numbers will always differ, their logical arguments always opposing. In the end, everything they say will be of mere rhetorical value. One must question the validity of treating politics like war. Separating yourself into two distinct groups (liberals and conservatives) is merely the actions of sheep flocking to some symbolic beacon. It is not the sign of an informed voter...regardless of how many news clippings, public polls and media jargon you scrap book.


Please JP. I don't agree with the separation that America is experiencing as of now between the liberals and the conservatives; our country is literally split. But I don't think that just because someone isn't bipartisan that they're 'flocking' to any belief. I don't believe that it's a bad thing to be informed and realize exactly what you believe in, and speak out for it. I on the other hand find those who are passive to be quite annoying. There's a saying "If you didn't vote, shut up" - same thing with this situation. If you don't have a position, don't bitch when things start to go wrong, because you're doing nothing as you just watch and let things happen around you. Passive people are by far the worse of the group. All we need in America is more stagnant, do-nothing, people supporters.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 10:54 PM
Atheist
Inactive
quote:
Lets take this one item at a time. I'm not going to debate poll numbers because polls can be inaccurate and can easily mirror the opinion of the pollster depending on how the question is worded. But I will agree that Bush's support among conservatives is dropping for several main reasons.



I'm not saying polls are accurate, I'm saying his numbers have changed for the worse since his re-election. In any case, what do you believe to be the cause in drop in support among conservatives?

quote:
Economies tend to be cyclical, however it is not one persons fault. Before Bush took office the economy was already starting to head south. The technology bubble had burst, and the GDP was cut from 7% to 4%. Now the "recession" began in Bush's third month in office. Before he had passed any significant economic legislation or had fully assembled his staff. Then when you factor in the impact of 9-11 you can't blame the guy.



Cyclical, yes. One person's fault it is not, that I agree with. But his policies are another story. Rampant spending, too many tax cuts targetted towards the rich in a time of war/economic hardship. These things take their toll. As opposed to Clinton's policies of fiscal discipline and expanding trade with the world and generally investing in the country itself (rather than boosting defense spending and going on a rampage in Iraq) well things end up differently.
Unemployment rate:



Dow jones:



NOTE: It doesn't include the recovery, but Bush is still running a deficit here on the markets as well. As opposed to growth under ClintonRazz

Employment vs. population ratio:


The deficit:



Clinton reduced the deficit and left office with a yearly budget surplus. While we were still in debt, he was running in the green and Bush is running in the redRazz

quote:
Iraq is a tough situation. The exit strategy for Bush is called victory.


To quote the man himself, one would think we already won "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed". Bring it on, I suppose. But that was a cheap shot, a very cheap shot. Kerry wouldn't even run that ad, unfortunately, and had he I think we'd be in a different situation today. ~300 billion later, 1700 dead and 6 empty chemical munitions shells, here we are with a broken country that we're propping up with our blood, money and time. We have no exit strategy, because we have no criteria for victory, means to acheive such and most importantly no timetable or list of things to accomplish.




We're mired in quagmire, our economy is in uncertainty and we're in debt up to our eyeballs. Mission accomplished indeed. Smile

edit:

images refixed

[This post edited by Atheist on 20 June 2005 ]

quote / posted 19 June 2005 11:22 PM
Atheist
Inactive
quoting: Dante
I think the under lying issue in all of this is that both Will and Alexander are swept up by Jacksonian politics. Their numbers will always differ, their logical arguments always opposing. In the end, everything they say will be of mere rhetorical value. One must question the validity of treating politics like war. Separating yourself into two distinct groups (liberals and conservatives) is merely the actions of sheep flocking to some symbolic beacon. It is not the sign of an informed voter...regardless of how many news clippings, public polls and media jargon you scrap book.



This is not the case, I dislike both major political parties. To be completely truthful, I don't really like the idea of political parties. I don't like George W. Bush, but it is not because he is a "conservative", has ideas different from my own or even any of his policies or positions. It isn't even his annoying personality.

It's that he is from Texas, which is poo on a stick. Just kidding, but the real reason I dislike him is that he never should have been President and his presidency has been a giant assault on the Bill of Rights that has been done in the form of Patriot Act, expanding government in size, scope and role and the fact that the people around him seem bent on world domination through American military might is something that frankly scares the Jesus out of me.

In general, I really don't like politicians. I'd probably feel similar towards just about anyone in the office right now.
quote / posted 19 June 2005 11:39 PM
Delphian
Inactive In reference to Alexander's cyclical comment: just because something occurs many times, and is seen on multiple accounts, it doesn't make it okay.

And if you are going to chalk the declining of our economy to cyclical matters, much outside the influence of Bush, you damn better attribute any rise of it, as well.

[This post edited by besttexever on 20 June 2005 ]

quote / posted 20 June 2005 6:47 AM
Atheist
Inactive While I know your places no importance on polls, Alexander, public support for the war in Iraq is evaporating. In a very real sense, this is bad for Bush and very bad for his agenda. As the war drags on and the casualties mount, all while he has no exit strategy or timetable, the public will continue to lose patience. Displayed below, is a chart of public support (in America) for the war in Iraq.



Polls indeed have their inaccuracies, Alexander. They even have their biases, but Gallup is a widely respected poll that actually usually has Bush's numbers higher than other polls like CBS/NYT, Pew Research, etc. A 12% swing in a few months though is extremely singificant, because it shows an overall change in public perception of the war. In this same poll 56% of Americans believe the war was not worth fighting. In a very real sense, this might make Bush a lame duck President well before his time.

I don't have to tell you that an unpopular President damages his party and subsequently their agenda. Bush's job approval in this Gallup poll is holding steady at 47%, but for the first time in his presidency over 50% of the public disapproves of how he is handling his job in the Gallup poll.



I don't like to gloat, but I argued this back in March 2003:

quoting: Atheist

There are many reasons why we do not need a war in Iraq.

The first and most obvious is probably the fact that there really is no convincing evidence that Saddam Hussein's regime actually has WMD in their posession. Until we have up close photos of the WMD, I don't think we should be charging into war.



quoting: Atheist

If we do goto war, what happens with Iraq after the war? We are talking a 5-10 year military occupation by most likely the United States to ensure any real kind of stable government can form there. Democracies aren't made overnight.



quoting: Atheist

The costs will be the stability of our economy here in America, possibly thousands of lives (if he does infact have and uses WMD or suicide bombs), and billions of dollars that should be spent to pump up our already failing state economies. The cost will be heavy on our political relations as well. The world will see the US as a belligerent superpower and Tony Blair as our unwitting puppet. War should only be looked at as a last resort. We shouldn't be looking at the UN as a stumbling block for war.



On the issue of WMD, I was right. On the issue of losing credibility in the world, I was right. On the issue of costs, I was wrong, because it actually has costed far more than billions. I really hate to say it, but in general I told you, ya stupid neo-conservative bastards. I was right, you were wrong and now your idiocy is making this nation pay its money and the blood of its young for a needless war sold off of a pack of lies. They aren't worth an ounce of our nation's blood, surely you can see this. They are a nation of ingrates that clearly only want us their to protect them and have something to ignorantly blame for their fear and crappy lifestyle. Hell is real, it has a face and it is Iraq. That country is pure hell, which is something you will have to trust me on.


So, if you dare to answer, exactly why are we still in Iraq? What are we accomplishing and if it is peachy in Iraq, why don't we have a timetable for troops coming home? If the insurgency is, as Dick Cheney claims, in its "last throes", why are we still cleaning up for the Iraqi government? Where are these magical weapons of mass destruction? Where is Osama bin Laden and why aren't we looking for him? How do you morally justify a war that was, in its entirety, sold off of forged intelligence and moral hypocrisy?

If Saddam Hussein was a moral menace and evil that had to be gotten rid of, why did we wait until 2003 to do it? Better yet, why did we aid him under Reagan with chemical weaponry, helicopters and money to fight against Iran? Why was this not articulated as a main reason for the war in Bush's 2003 state of the union address?

Would you, personally, describe the country of Iraq as "free" despite the fact that it lives under perpetual warfare, occupation and fear caused by the utter incompetency of the American military and these "last throes" of the insurgency? Do you believe this so-called liberation excuses the other immoral acts of war (killing, torture, lying, exclusive no-bid oil contracts, perhaps even war itself)? Despite the fact that Democrats voted for it, do you believe that history will remember this as their war or George W. Bush's war?

I'm not trying to be an ass, even though it probably seems that way. I just want to know what you believe on this issue and how anyone with your level of intelligence can continue to support such an obviously failed policy for no good reason at all. It's something that bothers me a great deal. Conservatives are supposed to oppose welfare, so how can we justify propping up an entire nation, indefinitely, with American money and blood if the justification for the war was even slightly questionable?

[This post edited by Atheist on 21 June 2005 ]

quote / posted 21 June 2005 5:10 AM
GhanaGurl_42
(512k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
.

[This post edited by Evanich on 20 November 2011 ]

quote / posted 21 June 2005 5:31 AM
Vespastic
(281k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
Finally someone as tedious as Alexander can argue this shit. I always feel irresponsible when I leave a flamewar without five or six graphs per post to somehow "prove my point", but I so can't be arsed to do it.

I think I'll just resort to drive-by insults.

"YOUR MOM IS GEORGE W. BUSH, ALEXANDER! WAIT NO! YOUR MOM IS JEB BUSH!"

vroom vroom vroom

"Quick get out of the dairy queen parking lot before he catches the license plate number!"

peeeling rubber

[This post edited by Vespastic on 21 June 2005 ]

quote / posted 21 June 2005 5:50 AM
Atheist
Inactive I'd comment further on all of this, but frankly I'm bushed. Goodnight everyone.
quote / posted 21 June 2005 5:54 AM
Vespastic
(281k) Adored
Spank! UltraStar
Click for profile
Then I'll have to talk trash about your momma, too.

YOUR mom is professional film and television actor David Caruso.

Burrrn.

God, I wish my persistent insomnia was any excuse to act this stupid.
quote / posted 21 June 2005 5:58 AM

Showing posts 1 to 20 : Next 20--> :
OR jump to page:  1  2  3 
Click to post a reply!
love life, be a teen New www directory of cool teen wensites. Add your today.


CondoFeed Blog Topics
Toronto Municipality: The Big Tax Loser with a Condo Bubble Burst
14 May 2012

HOA Hires Taser Wielding Guards for 3AM Eviction
04 May 2012

TD Canada Trust Condo Poll Results – Owners Confuse Fees with Rent
19 April 2012

247Condo Receives Consulting Recommendation
16 April 2012

When Considering a Condominium Purchase, Check How Long the President Has Ruled the Roost
10 April 2012

fun trustworthy and safe
Often rated a Cool Site for Teens and Youth.love life, be a teen
Quick Search Spank!:
love life, be a teen New www directory of cool teen wensites. Add your today.fun trustworthy and safe
Often rated a Cool Site for Teens and Youth.love life, be a teen
Spank - the longest running youth e.magazine @ 6077 days!
Our Tag lines: Youth Culture Online :: Youth by Youth :: Youth Culture Defined By Youth :: Spankmag.com
built and powered with lopedia portal code
:: in support with CondoPapers :: in support with CondoTop ::



top :: home :: LOG IN :: copyright 1995 - 2012, 2012 :: Click for Random
love life, be a teen New www directory of cool teen wensites. Add your today.New www directory of cool teen wensites. Add your today.

fun trustworthy and safe